Downtown, Brickell residents still question Miami DDA benefits, future

Downtown, Brickell residents still question Miami DDA benefits, future
  • Sumo

While there is a new chairman at the Miami Downtown Development Authority in freshly minted City Commissioner Ralph Rosado, it looks like the 58-year-old agency, which is tasked with assisting and incentivizing business in the urban core — hasn’t exactly shaken off the stink of recent scrutiny, with legit questions still swirling around its bloated budget and some very curious decision-making.

New face, same ol’ funk.

A number of Brickell and downtown condo dwellers have been complaining to the city commission and the administration about the DDA since the 15-member board voted earlier this year to give $100,000 to the UFC, a sports organization worth an estimated $12 billion. A closer look revealed that the agency had also given $450,000 — $150K a year for three years — to woo the FC Barcelona soccer club headquarters from New York to Miami, and $175,000 to the 2026 College Football Playoff National Championship host committee for, well, good measure maybe.

And, to boot, there are a lot of well-paid and overlapping staff positions with bloated salaries.

Some residents say they don’t want a 15-member board of insiders spending their tax dollars on things like trolley paint jobs and soccer club wooing while residents juggle $20 million assessments and skyrocketing insurance bills.

Read related: Ka-ching! Miami DDA is doling out more checks to billionaire companies

Leading the charge is James Torres, president of the Downtown Neighbors’ Alliance and an unofficial spokesperson for fed-up condo owners. “We want a divorce,” Torres said. “They’re double taxing us.”

““This is about fairness and democracy,” Torres said. “All we’re asking is for the City to give residents the opportunity to decide for themselves whether this additional tax should continue. No other community is forced to pay this surcharge, and it’s time to ask: should we?”

Torres has tried to engage the city in finding a solution. He has suggested the city change the structure and make the DDA more like a business improvement district, taxing only the commercial property owners and businesses — not the residents. And if the city doesn’t want to do that, then he wants them to put the future of the DDA on the ballot.

At the last commission meeting, Commissioner Joe Carollo moved to put a nonbonding question about the DDA on the November ballot. But it died for lack of a second.

Rosado, who was quick to abolish the Bayfront Park Management Trust, has said that the budget was possibly bloated and that there needed to be reform, including more residents on the 15-member board.

Brickell’s not happy either.

“Brickell is not downtown. Downtown is not Brickell,” said Ernesto Cuesta, president of the Brickell Homeowners’ Association. “This is taxation without representation. We don’t see the services.”

Ladra gets it. Condo life ain’t cheap. Especially if you’re getting hit with a $12,000 special assessment and a bonus tax for a group that, according to many residents, does nada for their quality of life.

Read related: Effort to dissolve Miami DDA cites ‘bloated’ salaries, redundancy, UFC gift

The DDA is made up of 15 hand-picked board members tasked with “economic development” in downtown. But more than half of its funding — 58 percent — comes from residential property owners. You know, the folks who actually live here. The same folks who are footing the bill for DDA pet projects like the $450K to FC Barcelona to move their U.S. office here and open a souvenir shop on Flagler. Because apparently what Miami really needed was another overpriced jersey store.

But wait, the DDA says, it’s all for the greater good: economic development, business grants, license plate readers, and a free trolley that still somehow manages to pass you by. And the agency does have its champions. But most of the people who spoke in favor of keeping the DDA at last week’s commission meeting — and every meeting where this has come up — are board members or employees or businesses that have benefitted from their grants. In what looked like a desperate PR campaign, former homeless people who are now employed by the DDA — known as “yellow shirts” because of their uniform — were paraded before the commissioners, pleading to save their jobs.

The DDA partners with Camillus House to provide economically disadvantaged and formerly homeless individuals opportunities for employment in what they call “the Downtown Enhancement Team,” so they get training and experience to reenter the workforce. Among the jobs they do: Street sweeping, litter and illegal dumping removal, graffiti abatement, sidewalk power washing and landscape installation and maintenance.

Oh, and serving as props for the DDA’s advocacy at commission meetings.

In reality, the DDA allocates just 1.25% of its $22 million budget to address the homelessness crisis that residents face every day. And that $22 million budget has grown from $13.5 million last year. That is more than a 50% increase. Some of this is given back to the city, for enhanced police patrols as one example.

Meanwhile, downtown residents are still feeling less safe, the historic Olympia Theater is on the auction block, and the Miami DDA is celebrating the long-overdue reopening of — wait for it — two whole blocks of Flager Street.

This is the Flagler Street promised in 2019. It doesn’t look like that, yet.

Yes, two. After three years of construction hell — that’s 40 months of barricades, bulldozers, broken promises and busted businessess — City Hall, the DDA and the Flagler Business Improvement District want a pat on the back for reopening a fraction of what was supposed to be a full five-block transformation project originally launched in 2019.

Leaders blame the delays partly on the COVID pandemic. “There have been a few issues with getting the contractor to stay on schedule,” Terrell Fritz, the director of the Flagler BID, told CBS News Miami in a story aired Wednesday.

Ladra’s not saying a makeover wasn’t needed. The new look — with its fancy brick pavers, outdoor café space, and what they’re calling a “festival streetscape” — does add a little Paris flair to the gritty downtown core. And yes, it’s great that Bespoke Barber Pub owner Clara Henao got to hang a liquor license next to the clippers thanks to some DDA assistance. Cheers to that.

But while the DDA touts this reopening as a “success story,” three blocks remain a construction zone. Officials say the dominoes will fall faster now — but after 40 months, Ladra’s not holding her breath.

Behind closed doors, the story is different. “We’ve put in millions and millions of dollars,” a resident said at the most recent DDA board meeting. The video was posted on Twitter by Torres.

“We’ve put in street furniture and every single piece of street furniture is either damaged, scratched, has huge chunks taken out of it.” By the time all of Flagler Street is open, “the assets we invested all these million of dollars on are already going to be 25 or 50% into their lifespan.”

Read related: Op Ed by DNA President James Torres: Miami doesn’t need a DDA anymore

If this is what the added DDA tax buys, it’s no wonder Brickell and Edgewater residents want out. They should demand a refund.

Because when you can’t get five blocks of downtown paved in under half a decade, it gets a little harder to sell the story that the DDA is “enhancing quality of life.”

Unless, of course, your idea of “quality” is dodging scaffolding while waiting for a trolley.

Still, Torres and other residents aren’t buying it. In a recent survey by the Downtown Neighbors’ Alliance, about 56% of the 850 respondents said the DDA hasn’t made life better. Maybe because the DDA’s idea of improving safety is buying more cameras while sidewalks crumble and scooters fly like weapons of war.

He and those who think like him say that if the DDA truly stands behind its value to the community, it should welcome this opportunity to let taxpayers decide. “Let our people vote. It’s fair, democratic, and long overdue,” Torres said.

While the commission took no action on Thursday, the DDA opponents in Brickell and Edgewater and downtown still want some relief. Not more red tape. Not more marketing gimmicks.

And definitely not more soccer swag.

11 Responses to "Downtown, Brickell residents still question Miami DDA benefits, future"

  1. Thank you Ladra for your response. I don’t know specifics on line items but from having attended recent DDA meetings I believe the allocation to homelessness initiatives is a lot higher than that, and for sure that no budget increases overall are planned. I understand that every budget can be improved and there is no agency that is perfect, and I also understand that nobody likes paying taxes and many will disagree w the corporate sponsorships . But I’ve been seeing the tangible work done by DDA since I moved downtown in 2013 and I can tell you they are being unfairly attacked with a lot of misinformation thrown into the mix intentionally by people with motives. I don’t know how the BID concept would work as an alternative to current structure, but what I do know is my contribution of approx $20 per month to DDA is a drop in the bucket compared to the taxes I pay to the general fund, and I really enjoy and take advantage of the programming, micromobility and activations that DDA funds with that money. And from my experience DDA has always been open to collaborating with and welcoming feedback from residents ab what they do and how they can do it better. Funny enough, when I was DNA president years ago, they were pretty much our strongest partner in accomplishing small wins for the residents like graffiti cleanup, getting street lights fixed etc. I think it would be great if you heard more from them to better understand their work. Lastly, not all residents who support DDAs efforts do so bc they’re getting grants, some of us just come from a place of gratitude bc we see some good work being done. Personally, I think we need more of that these days and less of the haterade.

  2. Hi Cristina. Great to see you again.

    I’m sorry for not being more specific. The $22 million this year apparently includes “carry over” from years past. Which raises whole new questions about the carry overs. How much from each year? Why not return it to taxpayers?

    What’s more is, unless I’m wrong, which I am sure you will say if I am, the budget for billionaire brand gifts did expand, from $1.35 million to $2.72 million, which is a 100% jump, right? And homeless allocation is still at about 1.5% of the total budget?

    I tried reaching Christina Crespi, the executive director, but she is apparently MIA. Has been for a while. I hope she’s okay. Chairman Ralph Rosado is new — and a liar anyway, so hard to believe. And the meetings that are streamed online are such bad quality that you can’t really see anybody or hear what is being said. It sounds like a badly tuned radio. Not everyone can be there in person in the middle of the day. Also, it looks like questions are not welcome from what I have been able to discern.

    I’m willing to give the DDA a full, well-rounded look. I will gladly meet with someone to go over the budget and why those expenses are necessary. But I have heard the pitch on the FC Barcelona gift and the UFC money and I’m not buying it. I’m surprised the DDA hasn’t given any money to the FIFA World Cup … yet. Has anybody given any thought to the prospect of turning it into a real business improvement district, if not in name in structure?

    Stay in touch. Love, Ladra.

  3. Hello
    I have to say that it’s called voter suppression when the Commission, regardless of who’s item it was, needed to place their egos aside and allowed the question to have been placed on the ballot! it was just a simple question, more like a survey BUT the egos of Pardo/Gabela and Rosardo and King got the best of them!

    This is about community, not a political game that these folks want to play

    Shame Shames Shame on all of them

  4. Ladra you are sacrificing your journalistic integrity by not fact checking the stories Torres is feeding you. The DDA budget has absolutely not had a 50% increase in one year as you report in this story, the last two years it was almost flat and new 2025-2026 budget as proposed doesn’t even reflect an increase. This is as patently false as the exagerrated amount of taxes paid to DDA which you also printed and later retracted on this same topic a few weeks ago. You should retract this too.

    I have read and very much respected your work exposing Miami corruption for several years now, but sad to say much less so these days.

    Your readers look to Political Cortadito to report us facts. Disappointing as.a reader to keep having to correct misinformation published to Miami residents from a supposed warchdog blog.

  5. DDA staffers are massively overpaid. Most do nothing. And the DDA pays over $700,000 per year for rent and free parking to his useless employees. Theft. Graft. We are witnessing a crime. Need more proof? The DDA uses the criminal Melissa Tapanes as their mouthpiece.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.