And the $350,000 would go to an FIU program run by
a former president — who gave $20,000 to his campaigns
Miami-Dade Mayor Carlos Gimenez must have opened another drawer the other day.
Because he found some more money for something he wants that means absolutely nothing to the constituents and people who he allegedly serves.
Gimenez wants to spend $350,000 to give 30 top administrators — the members of his inner circle and keepers of his darkest secrets — some leadership classes at Florida International University that the Miami Herald’s usually dry Doug Hanks very correctly interpreted as “lessons on self-awareness, body language and the impact of family backgrounds,” whatever that is. He forgot “how to engage with others.”
And, get this: Next year, Gimenez wants to send 100 staffers. Would that then cost the county $1.2 million? For an education in body language and self awareness?
Really? Really? This is the best way to spend our hard-earned tax dollars? Why don’t we let the cronies at the county compete with the already vastly eduated public? It’s not our job to ensure that they meet the standards of good leadership? With the inclusion of a psychologist on the panel of teachers, it seems that we are also providing these understandably traumatized public employees with much-needed therapy (is there a couch, too?).
There was so much hype a couple of years ago about former Commissioner Juan Zapata billing the county $31,000 for a Harvard “master’s” program — even though Commissioner Jean Monestime also got reimbursed $12,400 for a Harvard “executive business” course and nobody talked about that — that this seems a little, well, hypocritical at worst, frivolous at best. Ladra has it on good authority that the Zapata story was pushed by a Gimenez aide to discredit one of the mayor’s biggest critics. And now they promote this as progressive minded. How convenient.
Can it be because the mayor has been safely elected for the last time (at least consecutively), spending $350,000 on continuing education for 30 of the mayor’s chosen county employees — the ones who know where the bones are buried — is suddenly okay? Can someone say double standard?
Or could it simply be quid pro quo?

Former FIU President Modesto “Mitch” Maidique — who designed the FIU Center for Leadership and is employed by it — gave Gimenez at least $20,000 in campaign contributions to the mayoral account and both political action committees since 2011 (including $14,000 from his then-wife, Nancy Maidique).
Maybe former county commissioner Katy Sorenson and her husband should have donated to the Gimenez PAC to keep the Good Government Initiative at the University of Miami going. Certainly, his staffers would benefit more from ethics lessons than any self-awareness or body language bullshit.
Some of the new “students” identified in a Gimenez memo are the same members of his inner circle who already took a one-day, 10-hour “leadership course,” because one has to use the term loosely, at the same FIU scam, er, program in 2012.
Sure, it was just a one-day intensive course but that
class (photographed to the left) was attended by Gimenez, his five deputy mayors — Russell Benford, Alina Hudak, Chip Iglesias, Ed Marquez and Bernard “Jack” Osterholt — his former communications chief Fernando Figueredo, his former deputy and current chief of staff, Alex Ferro, Inson Kim, who was his director of policy and legislative affairs then and is now heading the communications and outreach department, former senior advisor Lisa Martinez and Budget Director Jennifer Moon.
Guess it didn’t stick because they are all going back to school. Every one of the administrators who took the 2012 crash course are coming back to campus (with the exception of the three who are no longer at the county). Plus now the list attached to the mayor’s memo also includes what looks like every department director: Communications Director and Mouthpiece Michael Hernandez, Fire Chief David Downey, Police Director Juan Perez, Human Resources Director Arleene Cuellar, Transportation and Public Works Director Alicia Bravo, Water and Sewer Director Lester Sola, Seaport Director Juan Kuryla, Director of Cultural Affairs Michael Spring and so on and so on and so on.
These are people who make six figure annual salaries. Kuryla is at $297,000. Ed Marquez makes $267,000. Alina Hudak gets paid just under $259,000. Sola and Osterholt each make about $250,000. Which means they can all afford to pay for their own professional development. Why is that the taxpayer’s responsibility?
And shouldn’t they already possess this particular skill set? Wouldn’t this course be more geared to build a bench from the assistant directors and supervisors who are really doing all the work anyway?
I mean, if Alina Hudak and Ed Marquez and Russell Benford and Lester Sola and Juan Kuryla don’t know how to read body language already, we’re worse off than anyone thought. What do they say about teaching old dogs? And we certainly don’t need them to be more self aware. We need them to be more aware of everybody else.
Or is this how Gimenez, who is on his last four years, trying to help his cronies be more employable when he’s gone?
This whole thing smells fishy. Too bad they can’t see Ladra’s body language. They would have no trouble reading it.
It says, “Bitch, please.”


Agreed. The education of staff is viewed as an investment in the organization. However most of the names mentioned are in the sunset of their careers or already in DROP. Just from a cost benefit ratio this is a poor investement and since Carlos tells us he is so good on that kind of math he knows this makes zero economic sense which only leaves us to conclude it is some reach around payback.
BtW ever notice how many disgraced, fired or former County employees land as FIU employees?
I don’t think the trickle down economics really works in this way?
It would be the underlings who need developed. If you look at the directories, the same bizarre last names repeat. Just like royal inbreeding, it leaves us with staffers who are inept yet have job security vis a vis nepotism. It seems his current team of deputies are already high performing.
They should have the county employees go through a competitive process where we the tax-payers sit on a review panel to determine who needs developed…
It would be interesting to see an ethics investigation.
I am not sure Commissioner Sorenson would be the best to teach them all ethics anyways. She has been around all of the crooked politicians for too long. She is just better at hiding the same tricks the rest of them pull. She continues to pull and push her weight, I am sure.
If by now these department directors and mayor’s aides, have not developed the prerequisite leadership style . . . fuggedaboutit. Most of these county senior managers have earned bachelors, masters and even doctorate degrees in relative managerial disciplines; so why waste the taxpayers dollars? No, what this is, cloaked in an ostensible management improvement endeavor, is a Quid pro quo to “Mitch” Maidique.
If our “honorable” mayor truly wants to improve leadership skills, he would have sought out The Center for Leadership Studies. Home of “The Situational Leadership® Model.” Open and read the attached link and be exposed to what unarguably is the “grail” for leadership studies. Sadly for Miami Dade County taxpayers, who must pay the $350K bill, Dr. Paul Hersey likely did not contribute to Gimenez mayoral campaign.
In a veto proof decision, Commissioners must stop the glaring payback.
https://situational.com/the-cls-difference/situational-leadership-what-we-do/
if they make that much money, it is because they are already professionally-developed.
Giménez is just out of control. He deceived us all. Now he’s more Trumpista than the Trump.
Can’t commissioners put a kabash on this? The ethics commission tell the county this isn’t correct expenditure of tax dollars? Put the $350,000 in the pot with the $25,000 awarded the kill shelter to spay/neuter pets FREE instead! It’s a far cry from the $20 million THE MAYOR HIMSELF PROMISED IN 2012, FUNDED THEN PULLED CLAIMING WE DIDN’T KNOW WHAT WE VOTED FOR WHEN 65% OF US PASSED THE PET’S TRUST. But if the $25,000 awarded by the Animal Friends license plate funds 500 free surgeries for income qualified residents per the kill shelter’s statement then $350,000 would do an additional 7,000. Again not NEARLY ENOUGH given the Pet’s Trust would have funded 120,000 surgeries ANNUALLY FOR FIVE YEARS but at least it’d serve the public’s 2012 mandate. And if these alleged ‘public servants’ (and I’m certainly not getting my fair share of the combined salaries they steal, are you?) need this kind of training FIRE them they don’t belong in their positions to begin with. SERVE THE PEOPLE. How come our votes counted when this dictator was elected and NOT when 65% of us (a percentage Comrade Gimnez could only dream about for himself) mandated FUND THE PET’S TRUST? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLMLOz8kC8E
County administrators are always circling their wagons to protect their position!!!
Raquel Regalado may have been quite right about Giminez… A big shout out of
“Hello” for Ed Marquez, an old mentor of mine.