End county baggage wrap monopoly, end conflict

End county baggage wrap monopoly, end conflict
  • Sumo

If we are to believe the mayor or commissioners of Miami-Dade County, baggage wrap plastic is courtesy-Secure-Wrapgoing to bring Miami International Airport down.

Mayor Carlos Gimenez thinks that any regulations of baggage wrap are “ludicrous” and agrees with MDAD Director Emilio Gonzalez that it will make MIA the laughing stock of the aviation world to start policing plastic. He said that the operational costs and logistics of regulating the wrap that goes through the airport that sees 42 million people a year is less than how much more the county would make from the increased sales that would benefit the vendor with the contract.

And as difficult as it may be for Ladra to say this, he’s got a point.

Commissioners — at least 10 of them — think that the inferior cocooning of luggage by rogue wrappers without a county contract is taking money out of their pockets and, worse, causing widespread chaos. Led by Commissioner Juan Zapata, they said they had an obligation to protect the contractor that won the bid — and, by the way, donated a total of more than $50,000 to several of their campaigns — because, otherwise, who would do business with the county? They won the bid fair and square. zapatagimenezWhat would happen if this kind of rogue business crept in to other county contracts?

They have a point, too, and voted 10-2 (Commissioners Daniella Levine-Cava and Jean Monestime voted against; Sally Heyman was absent) to have the mayor come up with standards for outside vendors that are as strict as whatever standards there are for the contracted vendor.

And it was fun to watch the commission get one over on a mayor who was much too smug throughout the meeting and seemed to relish in this slapdown of the company he rejected for the competition. The commission overrode his recommendation to hire Safe Wrap, which has had more than 30 lobbyists since it started courting the county in the late 1990s, over True Star/Sinapsis, which only had about a dozen.

If it wasn’t sweet outright vengeance for the mayor, it was serendipity. Las malas lenguas say he wants Safe Wrap to come back to renegotiate what it gives the county so that he can go out to bid again.

But in reality, our leaders shouldn’t even be talking about this. We have far bigger problems and issues for them to put their little heads together on than the baggage wrap war at the airport.

And here’s the kicker: They never discussed the one thingmonopoly that would solve any problem and create a situation where the county — that means you, dear reader — and the consumer (that means you, too) benefits. End the monopoly. Let multiple companies provide the service at MIA.

Why is this multi-million business given to the one company with the best presentation and the slickest lobbyists after a grueling process laden with influence and almost always protested by the other side? The fact that there is so much business sort of drives the point home. Why can’t we divvy up the airport and let several vendors compete for customers by providing a better quality or price?

Commissioners may get the opportunity to end the monopoly sooner rather than later. The mayor is expected to veto their 10-2 decision, which could bring it back up at the next meeting. Political Cortadito has heard that some commissioners may cave.

Commissioner Xavier Suarez told Ladra he would switch his vote if he can be convinced that the cost is higher than the benefit. If, like Gimenez said, “the solution is worse than the problem.”

But he was also open to the idea of opening the monopoly up to other firms.

“My wife asked the same question,” he told Ladra when I asked him why they couldn’t have two or even three companies provide the service.

The only one who would not want that is the current contract holder Safe Wrap. But, like Gimenez said, they basically invented rogue wrapping when they were on the outside and True Star had the contract.

That’s what they call serendipity.

 

3 Responses to "End county baggage wrap monopoly, end conflict"

  1. 2 cheers for getting around to it and kind of calling it like it is. Then again, you’re so eager to not give the mayor too much credit that you say Zapata and his cash stuffed posse have a point…uh, no they don’t. If the vendor is so unhappy with the agreement then get out of it. It wouldn’t be the first time a vendor does that. No, they want to end the practice that they started – makes no sense and at the risk of sounding like Trump, un-American. Honestly I’m disappointed in Zapata. He’s a hawk on budget issues. He’s also bright and other than one little blight (that really wasn’t) he’s held himself to a higher standard. I hope this is just an aberration because he has a great deal to offer.

    Competition is a great, which is the attraction of your idea but I am wondering about implementation. Let’s be honest – the fight is going to be smack dab in the middle of MIA – the Cuba charters. The rest of MIA is gravy but the meat is right there at the heart of the airport. So what do you do, price them differently? Charge more in the middle and less at the ends? Could get messy.

    In the end let them open up talks to reduce the guarantee. If that doesn’t work and vendor wants out, then bid out and see what happens. If no one wants to do it then they will need to drop to something that vendors think makes sense.

    Let the market decide not a Commission that can’t resist the pull of lobbyists. Big kudos to Monestime and Levine Cava.

  2. Talk about a solution in search of a problem….This has to be one of the lowest skilled labor jobs out there and a business with ridiculously low entry cost…yet apparently a profit margin up there with drug smuggler based on the money the principles have to spend on the political process..

    Which begs the question, for the price of a machine and a kid to press the button, seems like this a job even the county could profitably handle itself.

  3. ZaPATA IS LIKE A mAFIA pROTECTING ! Did they forgot the Free Enterprise . ¿ Are they protecting The Donations to their Campaign “or” The People ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.