It’s tradition now. The Kendall Federation Political Action Committee, the political arm of the Kendall Federation of Homeowners Associations, has come out with their endorsements for both Miami-Dade candidates and the state amendments on the ballot.
The PAC decided not to endorse anyone in the State House races in districts 118 and 119, which cover parts of Kendall. But they have their favorites in all the county constitutional offices, a school board race and a county commission runoff. These are them:
- For sheriff, James Reyes
- For clerk and comptroller, incumbent Juan Fernandez-Barquin
- For supervisor of elections, JC Planas
- For tax collector, former State Rep. and Miami Beach Commissioner David Richardson
- For property appraiser, Marisol Zenteno
- For Miami-Dade School Board, District 7: Maxeme “Max” Tuchman
- For Miami-Dade Commission, District 7: Former State Rep. and Pinecrest Mayor Cindy Lerner
These are mostly the same endorsements the committee made for the August primary ballot. Except in the clerk’s race they co-endorsed Fernandez-Barquin and former Sen. Annette Taddeo, who is running against him. What did she do to lose their favor?
Read related: Miami-Dade November sheriff’s race pits James Reyes vs Rosie Cordero-Stutz
The group also met and decided to suggest answers on the six state amendments on everyone’s ballot.
They say vote NO to constitutional Amendment No. 1, which would require partisan elections rather than non-partisan for members of a district school board starting with the 2026 election.
They say vote NO to Amendment No. 2, the stupidly named “forever fishing and hunting” amendment, which is really a rollback of wildlife protections in favor of outdated and inhumane practices.
They say vote YES to Amendment No. 3, which would legalize the purchase, possession and use of marijuana by adults at least 21 years old.
They say vote YES to Amendment No. 4, which would remove the current ban on abortions after six weeks of pregnancy by prohibiting any law that would restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider. This amendment does not change the Legislature’s constitutional authority to require notification to a parent or guardian before a minor gets an abortion — despite some misleading advertising.
Read related: Ladra’s guide for state amendments, wifi question on the November ballot
They say vote YES to Amendment No. 5, which would provide an annual inflation adjustment for the property tax exemption applied to homesteaded properties.
They say vote NO to Amendment No. 6, which aims to repeal the requirement in the state constitution that allocates public financing for campaigns of candidates for elective statewide office who agree to campaign spending limits.
The Kendall Federation and the KFHA represent tens of thousands of homeowners in the Kendall area.
“We believe in recommending those candidates who strongly represent the views and interests of Kendall and all of Miami-Dade County,” said PAC Chairman Marvin Stein in a statement.
Early voting ends Sunday.
Kendall Federation posts picks for Miami-Dade seats, state amendments added by Ladra on
View all posts by Ladra →
[…] Read related: Kendall Federation posts picks for Miami-Dade seats, state amendments […]
Florida is the only state in U S South , that possibly will make smoking pot condoned by law. Not it’s contiguous neighbors, nor anywhere up the S E Coast until MD and DC. It’s unconsciounable, foremost, because children would have to look at this detrimental practice , as normal. ( Because if someone wants to live with sub-par cerebral functions, it’s none of our business ) .
“What did she do to lose their favor?” What does that even mean.
Why is no one calling out the fact that Barquin used tax payer money to campaign and broke the law by not taking a leave of absence to campaign?
We cannot denounce corruption only in certain cases!! #BecauseMiami
Good to see some logic with not going party lines with the county endorsements 100%. The Clerk is an EASY pick. Pick someone with actual experience to be a Clerk for Court, or something just looking for a new elected position. Electing someone who is not an attorney to be Clerk of Court makes no sense. And his record fixing up the Clerk’s office since appointment has been something.